RETROSPECTIVE TAX About a fortnight ago, the income tax (I-T) department sent a reminder notice to the UK-based Vodafone Group Plc to pay Rs 14,300 crore in tax dues and threatened to seize the assets in case of non-payment. Foreign investors have taken umbrage to it. Vodafone termed this as an act completely out of sync with Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s promise “Retrospective tax is a matter of past… We are ensuring that neither this government nor future governments can open this chapter” made during India – France Business Summit in January, 2016. Others opined this is return of tax terrorism, a phrase coined in the wake of a retrospective amendment in tax laws initiated by then finance minister Pranab...
More No comments
News & Media
Perception vs reality
BAD SUBSIDIES : The only way to remove fertiliser subsidy is through direct benefit transfer in place of routing subsidy through the industry. Addressing a global business summit recently, Prime Minister Narendra Modi for the first time, shared at length his thinking on subsidies. He said, “We have to eliminate bad subsidies, whether or not they are called subsidies. But, some subsidies may be necessary to protect the poor and the needy and give them a fair chance to succeed. Hence, my aim is not to eliminate subsidies but to rationalise and target them.” He continued: “I am referring to cooking gas, fertiliser and kerosene subsidies. I must confess that I am surprised by the way words are used by...
More No comments
Distorted gas allocation to fertiliser sector
Fertiliser needs gas on priority and at reasonable rates, more so non-urea fertiliser producers The Modi government is doing everything within its executive power to ensure that ‘Make in India’ succeeds. However, there is one sector, fertilisers, which has not got the attention it deserves. Even after two-and-a-half decades of reforms, this industry not only remains highly regulated with intrusive controls on production, distribution, sales and pricing, it is also excessively micromanaged. Controls on selling price at levels unrelated to cost, and subsidy accounting for an overwhelming share of manufacturers’ realisation from sale have seriously hampered the sector’s ability to survive. No fresh investment has been made in this industry for close to two decades. Discriminatory policy Even as the...
More No comments
POLICY MUDDLE IN FDI RETAIL
The Government’s unrealistic policy of barring foreign direct investment in the business-to-consumer segment has pushed e-commerce retailers to camouflage themselves as market places to access funds from abroad The Delhi High Court is hearing a plea filed by the All-India Footwear Manufacturers and Retailers Association, regarding the alleged flouting of foreign direct investment rules by e-commerce companies. In its affidavit to the court, the Department of Industrial Policy and Promotion has argued that its job is to formulate policy — not monitor implementation. The DIPP added that it has already laid down a ‘transparent’ and ‘predictable’ policy which permits 100 per cent FDI in business-to-business transactions in e-commerce, but only prohibits in the business-to-customer segment. Further, it does not recognise...
More No comments
DEBUNK ‘FAMILY SILVER’ ARGUMENT
In a clear case of judicial overreach, the Supreme Court has stopped the Government from selling its residual shares in Hindustan Zinc Limited even though it had no problems when majority of the shares were sold years ago In recent times, the judiciary has made deep inroads into policy making that lies strictly within the executive domain. The latest manifestation is an order by the Supreme Court to the Government of India, to stop selling the latter’s residual stake in Hindustan Zinc Limited. This order came in response to a public interest litigation filed by the National Confederation of Officers Associations of Central Public Sector Undertakings in 2014, which challenged the proposed sale of the Government’s 29.5 per cent stake...
More No comments
Dashing innovators’ hopes
Govt needs to shed its current intransigence. It should stop viewing patent laws from a prism that ‘only MNCs benefit from these’. Interacting with America’s top CEOs [including MNCs in pharmaceutical and agrochemical sectors] in September, 2015, Prime Minister Narendra Modi had assured “we are committed to protecting Intellectual Property Rights [IPRs] which is essential to fostering creativity”. These MNCs spend billions of dollars on research and development to discover and develop new medicines and crop protection products and have a fundamental interest in the protection of IPRs. They had flagged Section 3[d] of Patent [Amendment] Act 2005 and provision relating to grant of compulsory licenses as major concerns. However, from the draft of new National IPR policy, it appears...
More No comments
Too little too late
PM Modi needs to shed his soft-pedalled approach displayed in the “GiveItUp” campaign and bring the LPG subsidy to a full halt. The government has announced that from January 1, those earning more than Rs 10 lakh per annum will forgo subsidy on LPG on a self-declaration basis. This appears to be a grandiose announcement but in terms of reforms, it is a typical case of “too little too late”. At present, there are a total of 163 million registered LPG customers. Of these, 147 million people are availing subsidy. The remaining 16 million is accounted for by about 10 million–bogus/ fictitious persons–who were eliminated following the government’s drive to credit subsidy directly into the bank account of customers under...
More No comments
Doha agenda cast aside
WTO Nairobi Ministerial : The US has been asking India to supply all sorts of data which tantamount to virtual surveillance on our food security system In a brazen display of ‘might is right’ in the just concluded World Trade Organisation’s (WTO) 10th ministerial meeting at Nairobi, Kenya between December 15-19, the developed countries led by the US and the EU literally junked the Doha Development Agenda (DDA). On the two issues of critical importance to developing countries viz., (i) public stock holding for food security and (ii) special safeguards mechanism (SSM) in agriculture, they were merely handed out hollow assurances. At the 9th ministerial in Bali (December, 2013), developed countries had agreed to a ‘peace clause’ under which, if...
More No comments
It’s wrong to deny gas to the fertiliser sector
And worse still, to favour urea producers over decontrolled fertiliser units in gas allocation, exacerbating the nutrient imbalance The manner in which gas is allocated within the fertiliser sector smacks of arbitrariness. The Centre gives a uniform subsidy to all manufacturers, including those of decontrolled complex fertilisers, under the Nutrient Based Scheme (NBS) . Why, then, does it use a different yardstick for allocation of gas to manufacturers of urea on the one hand and decontrolled fertiliser on the other? A two-judge bench of the Delhi High Court has ordered the government to resume supply of natural gas to Deepak Fertiliser and Petrochemicals Corporation (DFPCL), a manufacturer of decontrolled phosphatic fertilisers, which was arbitrarily suspended last year. The bench has...
More No comments
India must protect its agricultural support
It needs to get ERPs updated and purchases from poor farmers excluded from product-specific subsidy maths. The World Trade Organization’s (WTO) draft declaration for the ongoing ministerial meeting at Nairobi, Kenya, on December 15-18, 2015, promises to “address all aspects of agriculture reform as a matter of priority”, but does not mention anything about finding a ‘permanent solution’ to India’s concerns on food security. While declaration is just cleverly-worded rhetoric, the fact that India’s concerns remain unresolved is a setback. But, for any one tracking the events since the 9th ministerial meeting, at Bali in December, 2013, this should not come as surprise. It is abundantly clear that, from day-1, developed countries were never serious about finding a permanent solution....
More No comments