SUMMARY Direct transfer of subsidy to farmers holds the key to countering all ills afflicting the fertiliser sector Direct transfer of subsidy to farmers holds the key to countering all ills afflicting the fertiliser sector in India. Successive governments have talked about it and yet none has ventured to implement this. What has held them back? The idea was first mooted nearly four decades ago when, in March 1976, faced with increasing prices of complex phosphate fertilisers—then, there were no controls and manufacturers were free to fix price—the government introduced a flat subsidy at the rate of R1,250 per tonne phosphate nutrient (P2O5). The initial plan was to give the money directly to farmers so that the effective price (net...
More
No comments
Category: New Pricing Scheme (NPS) for Urea
Direct fertilizer subsidy payment to farmers – why dither?
Direct transfer of subsidy to farmers hold the key to countenancing all ills afflicting the fertilizer sector in India. Successive governments have talked about it and yet, none has ventured to implement this concept. What has held them back? The idea was first mooted nearly 4 decades ago when in March 1976, faced with increasing prices of complex phosphate fertilizers (then, there were no controls and manufacturers were free to fix price), the government introduced flat subsidy @ Rs 1250 per ton phosphate nutrient (P2O5). The initial plan was to give the money directly to farmers so that the effective price (net of subsidy) paid by them for these fertilizers was correspondingly reduced say by Rs 575 per ton in...
More
No comments
We need a coherent urea investment policy
A burden: And nobody will gain from it – A MURALITHARAN The urea industry is in need of wholesome nourishment rather than the piecemeal changes the Centre has been offering October 26, 2014: In January 2013, the Government had notified a urea investment policy (UIP) for new greenfield projects; expansion of existing units; additional urea from revamp of existing units and revival of projects of sick public sector units of the Fertilizer Corporation of India (FCIL) and Hindustan Fertilizer Corporation (HFCL). Early this year, it made two amendments in the UIP. The first dispensed with the “dispensation of guaranteed buy-back”, while the second requires interested private companies to give a bank guarantee of ₹300 crore for every project, while PSUs...
More
No comments
Urea investment policy – a dream shattered
In January 2013, government had notified a urea investment policy (UIP) for new green field projects; expansion of existing units; additional urea from revamp of existing units and revival projects of sick public sector units of Fertilizer Corporation of India (FCIL) & Hindustan Fertilizer Corporation (HFCL). Early this year, it made two amendments in UIP. The first amendment dispensed with the “dispensation of guaranteed buy-back ” outlined earlier. A second amendment requires interested private companies to give a bank guarantee (BG) of Rs 300 crore for every project, while PSUs firms are exempted from it. (In view of general elections and model code of conduct coming in to force, its notification was kept in abeyance. The amended policy has now...
More
No comments
Fertilizer reforms – deliver bitter pill for ‘achchhe din’
While, replying to debate on President’s address, the prime minister unveiled a 5 points agenda for ushering in a technology-led second green revolution in India. One of these is issue of soil health card (SHC) to every farmer to apprise about status of his soil. SHC will mention inter alia recommendations for fertilizer use taking in to account nutrient status of soil and crop type. The information will be computerized and each farmer given a unique identification number (UIN) to download the card for his farm. If the mission can be achieved within 5 years term of this government and farmers start following recommendations as per their respective cards, it will revolutionize the way Indian agriculture is practised. However, mere...
More
No comments
Fertilizer Industry in India – Challenges and Way-forward
Fertilizers – key to food security and sustainable agriculture Food security is of paramount importance to meet the growing food needs of an ever increasing population. Not having sufficient domestic production of food to meet requirement of 1.25 billion plus and still expanding will not only put a huge burden on scarce foreign exchange resources but can also expose us to exploitation in global market. Hence, there can be no compromise on this overriding goal. Agriculture has a share of around 15% in gross domestic product (GDP) and nearly 60% of population derives its livelihood from it. Industry and services sectors too depend heavily on it for their rapid and sustained growth. Therefore, agriculture needs to grow rapidly not only...
More
No comments
RIL/BP/Niko exploit ‘fault line’ in Rangarajan formula – for a bonanza
On January 10, 2014, Government had notified new guidelines for pricing of domestic gas applicable from April 1, 2014 that would lead to doubling from current US$ 4.2 per mBtu. Even as EC has deferred its implementation for now, meanwhile, fertilizer industry has got another shocker. In the gas sales purchase agreement (GSPA) for supplies from D-6 block of Krishna-Godavari (KG-D6) basin, Reliance Industries (RIL) has proposed that government fixed rate will be charged on gross calorific value (GCV) basis instead of current practice of charging on net calorific value (NCV). It also moots marketing margin of US$ 0.135 per mBtu on GCV basis. For arriving at price applicable to all domestic gas, Rangarajan formula takes average of hub prices...
More
No comments
Urea investment policy – a flop show, yet again
The Cabinet has recently approved an ‘amended’ new urea investment policy (UIP) which was notified in January 2013. The amendment drops the provision of guaranteed buy-back of urea from projects covered by it. Key features of the policy are in order. It assures investors in green-field and revival projects of sick public sector units of FCI & HFC a price linked to import parity price (IPP) with a floor (F) US$ 305 per ton and ceiling (C) US$ 335 per ton. This corresponds to gas price of up to US$ 6.5 per mbtu. For increase in gas price beyond this level, it provides for suitable adjustment in ‘F’ and ‘C’. Thus, for each $ increase up to US$14 per mbtu,...
More
No comments