BAD SUBSIDIES : The only way to remove fertiliser subsidy is through direct benefit transfer in place of routing subsidy through the industry. Addressing a global business summit recently, Prime Minister Narendra Modi for the first time, shared at length his thinking on subsidies. He said, “We have to eliminate bad subsidies, whether or not they are called subsidies. But, some subsidies may be necessary to protect the poor and the needy and give them a fair chance to succeed. Hence, my aim is not to eliminate subsidies but to rationalise and target them.” He continued: “I am referring to cooking gas, fertiliser and kerosene subsidies. I must confess that I am surprised by the way words are used by...
More
No comments
Category: New Pricing Scheme (NPS) for Urea
Bad subsidies – perception vs reality
Addressing the ET Global Business Summit, prime minister, Modi for the first time ever, shared at length his thinking on subsidies. The relevant excerpts are reproduced below:- “We have to eliminate bad subsidies, whether or not they are called subsidies. But, some subsidies may be necessary to protect the poor and the needy and give them a fair chance to succeed. Hence, my aim is not to eliminate subsidies but to rationalize and target them. I have been referring to cooking gas, fertilizer and kerosene subsidies. I must confess that I am surprised by the way words are used by experts on this matter. When a benefit is given to farmers or to the poor, experts and government officers normally...
More
No comments
Direct transfer of fertilizer subsidy – 12 commandments
Direct benefit transfer [DBT] of fertilizer subsidy offers huge benefits viz., rational allocation of resources, reduction of imbalance in NPK use, prevention of pilferage/black-marketing and saving in subsidy. Even as Modi – government is committed to introduce DBT, it would do well to seriously consider following 12 commandments:- (i) It must be made abundantly clear to all stakeholders that the day DBT is introduced, the present system of routing subsidy through fertilizer manufacturers will go. The new pricing scheme [NPS] for urea under which they are paid subsidy will be dismantled. Likewise, the nutrient based scheme [NBS] under which manufacturers of P&K fertilizers are paid subsidy will have to go. (ii) All manufacturers of urea and P&K fertilizers will sell...
More
1 comment
The unabated food and fertiliser worries
With reforms in fertilisers and food stuck in a groove, it is but natural that the government is shirking from paying subsidy arrears Hamstrung by its inability to achieve target for divestment proceeds from public sector undertakings (PSUs) and lower-than-expected collection from direct tax revenues, the government has resorted to hard posturing with regard to release of subsidy payments under major heads—fertilisers and food. As far as fertilisers are concerned, against a budget allocation of R73,000 crore for the current year, the requirement is expected to be around R80,000 crore. Even as the ministry of finance is likely to provide for additional R7,000 crore, it is in no mood to release arrears of about R30,000 crore from previous year. The...
More
No comments
Fertilizer and food subsidy haunt budget – sans reform
Hamstrung by its inability to achieve target for divestment proceeds from public sector undertakings [PSUs] and lower than expected collection from direct tax revenue, government has resorted to hard posturing in regard to release of subsidy payments under major heads viz., fertilizers and food. In regard to fertilizers, against budget allocation of Rs 73,000 crores for current year, requirement is expected to be around Rs 80,000 crores. Even as ministry of finance [MOF] is likely to provide for additional Rs 7000 crores, it is in no mood to release arrears of about Rs 30,000 crores from previous year. MOF has also rejected a request from department of fertilizers [DOF] for a special banking arrangement [SBA] for short-term loan of Rs...
More
No comments
Gas price loss is urea’s gain
It’s time to leverage the conditions. Freeing distribution and movement will also make a difference Under new pricing guidelines notified in October, 2014, the price of domestic gas was fixed at $5.61 per mBtu on net calorific value (NCV) basis with effect from November 1, 2014 — an increase of 33 per cent over the $4.2 per mBtu prior to that date. The price was applicable till March 31, 2015. The price was arrived at by taking a weighted average of gas prices in Henry Hub (the US), NBP (National Balancing Point, the UK), AGR (Alberta Gas Reference, Canada) and Russia. It was to be revised once in six months based on movement in these indices for a full year,...
More
No comments
Domestic gas price cut – can help end urea mess
Under new pricing guidelines notified in October, 2014, the price of all domestic gas was fixed at US$ 5.61 per mBtu [million British thermal units] on net calorific value [NCV] basis w.e.f November 1, 2014 which was an increase of 33% over US$ 4.2 per mBtu prior to that date. The price was applicable till March 31, 2015. The price was arrived at by taking a weighted average of gas prices in Henry Hub [USA], NBP [National Balancing Point] [UK], AGR [Alberta Gas Reference] [Canada] and Russia. It was to be revised once in 6 months based on movement in these indices for a full year three months prior to the date of next revision. Thus, for price effective from...
More
1 comment
Root cause of inaction in fertiliser reforms
Unless the government accepts a higher MRP for urea, nutrient imbalance cannot be addressed Four major pronouncements on fertiliser reforms need close scrutiny. First, the Prime Minister promised that every farmer would have a soil health card (SHC) to know how much nutrient is needed for a good yield and to keep the soil healthy. What if the results of the soil analysis encapsulated on the SHC require application of more phosphate (P) and potash (K) but the fertilisers carrying these nutrients, other complex fertilisers and so on are too expensive? The pricing consideration Currently, the MRP of dia-ammonium phosphate (DAP, the primary source of P) is four times the price of urea (the main source of nitrogen), whereas muriate...
More
1 comment
Fertilizer reforms – time to walk the talk
Successive governments have blatantly glossed over reforms in the fertilizer sector for generations. Modi who was catapulted to power on the promise of pushing reforms and development had generated hope. Yet, during last 15 months in office, one only hears loud talk but no action on ground. In this regard, four major pronouncements of Modi – dispensation need close scrutiny. First, the prime minister promised that every farmer has a soil health card [SHC] so that he knows how much nutrient he will need to apply for getting good crop yield and keep soil healthy and robust. This by itself is a herculean task requiring cooperation of all state governments and authorities right up to the village level to ensure...
More
No comments
Uniform fertilizer subsidy policy must for DBT
The subsidy regime, covering both subsidy rates and payment terms, for P&K fertilisers should be brought in sync with urea The discriminatory policy treatment impairs the ability of industry to supply P&K fertilisers to farmers at affordable prices, which will aggravate imbalance in fertiliser use. This makes a mockery of Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s vision behind giving farmers a Soil Health Card so that they apply fertilisers as per soil needs. On May 13, the government released press notes on the approval of the comprehensive New Urea Policy 2015 and the nutrient-based subsidy rates for phosphate and potash fertilisers for FY16. A key announcement was: “Movement plan for P&K fertilisers has also been freed to reduce monopoly of a few...
More
No comments