Category: Regulatory environment

Vaccination – make it free for all

Under a “Liberalised Pricing and Accelerated National Covid-19 Vaccination Strategy (LPANCVS)”, Covid-19”announced on April 19, 2021 to be implemented from May 1, 2021, Modi – Government plans to vaccinate all persons above 18 years age. Until hitherto, the vaccination drive (launched in January, 2021) covered healthcare workers, frontline workers and people above the 45 years of age. Vaccine manufacturers were making all their supplies to the Government of India (GOI) charging Rs 150 per dose even as the latter was arranging for inoculation of the eligible persons free at Government vaccination centers (GVCs); however, those opting to get vaccinated at private hospitals needed to pay Rs 250 per dose. GOI incurred subsidy on vaccination done at GVCs equal to Rs...
More Comments are closed

Scrappage policy can be more attractive

Announcing a ‘voluntary’ vehicle scrappage policy in the Lok Sabha on March 18, Union Minister Nitin Gadkari listed its numerous benefits, such as doubling the turn-over of the Indian automobile industry from the present Rs 4.5 lakh crore to Rs 10 lakh crore, the salutary effect on environment due to mitigation of vehicular pollution, a reduction in fuel consumption and fuel import bill, job creation, increased safety on the roads, reining in input costs for industries such as automobile, steel, electronics, etc., increase in GST collection, and so on. Currently, there are 5.1 million vehicles in India which are more than 20 years old, 3.4 million that are between 15 and 20 years old, and 1.7 million vehicles older than...
More Comments are closed

Vehicle scrappage policy – more incentives needed

On March 18, 2021, the Union Minister for road, transport and highways  Nitin Gadkari announced in the Lok Sabha a ‘voluntary’ vehicle scrappage policy which will lay the foundation for what he terms as “the Voluntary Vehicle Fleet Modernization Program and enable Indian automobile industry to more than double its turnover from the present Rs 450,000 crore crore to Rs 1000,000 crore in a few years. Besides, this will have a salutary effect on environment due to mitigated vehicular pollution. Other benefits are expected by way of reduction in fuel consumption (as old vehicles get replaced by more fuel efficient new ones) and cut in import bill; boost to inclusive development as investment flows into setting up of scrapping and...
More Comments are closed

Stop the back door bailout of banks

Why not give the capital directly from the Budget instead of following a circuitous route, setting up new institutions and adding to administrative and overhead costs? In the Union Budget for 2021-22, Finance Minister Nirmala Sitharaman has proposed setting up of a bad bank. Crafted as an asset reconstruction company (ARC), it will bundle up all the non-performing assets (NPAs) of banks, buy these at a negotiated (albeit discounted) price and sell them to investors such as private equity funds, alternative investment funds (AIFs) and so on, by putting a turnaround plan in place. An asset management company (AMC) will work on a detailed turnaround-cum-execution plan. The banks plan to transfer nearly Rs 2,00,000 crore of bad loans to the ARC. Every...
More Comments are closed

Bailing out banks – through backdoor

In the Union Budget for 2021-22, the Finance Minister, Nirmala Sitharaman has proposed setting up of a bad bank. Crafted as an asset reconstruction company (ARC), it will bundle up all the non-performing assets (NPAs) of banks, buy these at a negotiated (albeit discounted) price and sell them to investors such as alternate investment funds (AIFs) etc by putting a turnaround plan in place. An asset management company (AMC) will work on the details. The banks plan to transfer nearly Rs 200,000 crore of bad loans to the ARC. In return, the ARC will provide 15% upfront cash to banks, and issue security receipts (SRs) for the remaining 85%, to be guaranteed by the Government. The ARC will require a capital infusion of...
More Comments are closed

The Govt should avoid a Catch-22 situation

Team Modi should legitimise direct selling by foreign companies in Indian retail — not just online but also offline — without any riders In view of the complaints by the Confederation of All India Traders (CAIT) regarding blatant violation of the Foreign Direct Investment (FDI) policy and the Foreign Exchange Management Act (FEMA), 1999, by Amazon and Walmart-owned-Flipkart, Union Commerce Minister Piyush Goyal alluded to it while issuing a clarification to ensure that the e-commerce sector works “in the true spirit of the law.” Earlier in December 2020, the Ministry of Commerce had asked the Reserve Bank of India (RBI) and the Enforcement Directorate (ED) to take necessary action against these global e-commerce giants. The above actions may not enthuse when viewed...
More Comments are closed

To avoid cartelization – allow FDI in retail

Based on complaints submitted by the Confederation of All India Traders (CAIT) to the Union Commerce Minister Piyush Goyal in the recent past for blatant violation of FDI (foreign direct investment) Policy and Foreign Exchange Management Act (FEMA), 1999 by Amazon and Walmart-owned-Flipkart, the Department for Promotion of Industries and Internal Trade (DPIIT) of the Ministry of Commerce has written letters in December, 2020 to the Reserve Bank of India (RBI) and the Enforcement Directorate (ED) asking them to take necessary action against these global e-commerce giants. This communication from the DPIIT may not enthuse when viewed in the backdrop of numerous such representations made in the past by CAIT as also other associations of small traders and businesses such...
More Comments are closed

Stop chasing a mirage

The Govt needs to pursue disinvestment, including privatisation, as an objective by itself instead of linking it to revenue receipts and meeting the fiscal target The Department of Investment and Public Asset Management (DIPAM) is in a war of words with the Ministry of Finance (MoF) over the proceeds of disinvestment of the Government’s shareholding in Central Public Sector Undertakings (CPSUs) during 2020-21. The point raised by the DIPAM is that out of the Rs 2,10,000 crore target fixed in the Union Budget, a big slice of Rs 90,000 crore, was thrust upon it by the MoF as being the projected proceeds from the sale of 10 per cent shares in the Life Insurance Corporation (LIC) and its residual stake...
More Comments are closed

Disinvestment – chasing a mirage

Reportedly, the Department of Investment and Public Asset Management (DIPAM) which deals with all matters relating to management of Union Government investments in equity including disinvestment of its shareholding in Central Public Sector Undertakings (CPSUs) is in a war of words with the Ministry of Finance (MoF) over the target of proceeds of disinvestment during the current financial year (FY) i.e. 2020-21. In the Union Budget for 2020-21 presented on February 1, 2020,  the Finance Minister, Nirmala Sitharaman had set the target at Rs 210,000 crore – a steep increase over the revised estimate (RE) for FY 2019-20 at Rs 65,000 crore (the actual for that year was even lower at about Rs 50,000 crore). The point raised by DIPAM...
More Comments are closed

Don’t squeeze PSUs

The Govt should collect money from all those who owe it instead of squeezing CPSEs for bridging fiscal gaps. This is neither healthy for the economy nor good for the enterprises The Department of Investment and Public Asset Management (Dipam) has come out with a circular requiring Central Public Sector Enterprises (CPSEs) to pay interim dividend every quarter or half-yearly, depending on whether it is a relatively higher dividend (100 per cent or Rs 10 on a share of Rs 10) or less. Even those which can’t pay the prescribed “minimum” must give an interim dividend. Further, at least 90 per cent of the projected annual dividend should be paid as interim. Even as the bureaucrats justify this in terms...
More Comments are closed