Category: PSU reforms & dis-investment

A system failure

The bailout given to Yes Bank, using public money, emboldens banks to continue with their game plan. The Govt and the RBI must do everything to give a body blow to this attitude Much before the crisis at the beleaguered Yes Bank reached a flashpoint [when the Reserve Bank of India (RBI) on March 5, 2020, superseded its Board, appointed ex-Chief Finance Officer (CFO) of the State Bank of India (SBI) as its administrator and imposed a moratorium for a month on critical operations such as sanction of fresh loan, renewal of existing loans, Rs 50,000 ceiling on withdrawal of money per account] some depositors had already sensed it coming. They withdrew about Rs 18,000 crore during the first six...
More Comments are closed

Fiscal slippage – the denial syndrome

In the Union Budget for 2020-21, Finance Minister, Nirmala Sitharaman revised the fiscal deficit [FD] for 2019-20 to 3.8% of GDP – up from the budget estimate [BE] 3.3%. In absolute term, the RE is Rs 766,500 crore against BE Rs 700,000 crore. Sitharaman has explained away the slippage in terms of recommendation of the NK Singh committee on review of the Fiscal Responsibility and Budget Management [FRBM] Act which permits breach of the target in case of “far reaching structural reforms with unanticipated fiscal implications”. The justification is untenable as during the year, there was no reform measure that can be put in the category of ‘far reaching structural reforms’. The government could slip further even from the revised...
More Comments are closed

Not so strategic disinvestment

Unless there is an economic turnaround and the bureaucratic machinery moves with alacrity to make preparations for conducting PSU sales, the Govt will not reach the Rs 2,10,000 crore target Buoyed by the success of disinvestment in  Public Sector Undertakings (PSU) during 2017-18 and 2018-19 (when the Centre garnered over Rs 100,000 crore and Rs 85,000 crore respectively), for the current year, the Modi Government had set an ambitious target of getting Rs 1,05,000 crore. A major slice of these proceeds was to come from “strategic disinvestment” or transfer of a sizeable portion of ownership (this could go up to 51 per cent, implying privatisation) and management control to a private entity. The crucial “strategic disinvestment” proposals included divestment of all of...
More Comments are closed

Strategic disinvestment – will it take off in 2020-21

Buoyed by the success of disinvestment [sale of government shares in  public sector undertaking (PSU)] undertaken during 2017-18 and 2018-19 [when the centre garnered over Rs 100,000 crore and Rs 85,000 crore respectively], for the current year, Modi – government had set an ambitious target of getting Rs 105,000 crore. A major slice of these proceeds was to come from ‘strategic disinvestment’ – or transfer of a sizeable portion of ownership [this could go up to 51% implying privatization] and management control to a private entity. The crucial ‘strategic disinvestment’ proposals included divestment of all of government’s shareholding in Bharat Petroleum Corporation Limited [BPCL] 53.29% ; Containers Corporation of India [ConCor] 30%; Shipping Corporation of India [SCI] 63.75%; North Eastern...
More Comments are closed

IBC framework – springboard to 5 trillion dollar economy

In the midst of raging controversy over the Citizenship Amendment Act [CAA] [2019] and fear over the impending National Register of Citizens [NRC] capturing headlines in the media, a positive news for the  economy went unnoticed. This relates to improvement in the health of the banking system. According to the annual report on ‘trends and progress of banking in 2018-19’ released by the Reserve Bank of India [RBI], the gross non-performing assets [GNPA] – a euphemism for loans turning dud – expressed as percentage of total loans declined from a high of 11.2% during the financial year [FY] 2017-18 to 9.1% during FY 2018-19. During the current year, this has remained stable at 9.1 per cent as of September-end, 2019. Correspondingly,...
More Comments are closed

Bail out to all and sundry – road to disaster

The banks – mostly public sector banks [PSBs] – are relentlessly fighting a battle to deal with unsustainable levels of non-performing assets [NPAs] those were caused by ‘indiscriminate’ lending [with hardly any or no ‘due diligence’ which is a fundamental requirement for funding any project] mostly to corporate sector particularly during a decade under erstwhile UPA – dispensation [2004-2014]. While, NPAs have declined significantly from the peak level reached as on March 31, 2018 [courtesy, a massive dose of recapitalization by the union government of over Rs 300,000 crore during the last 5 years as also rigorous governance norms including putting some of them under prompt corrective action framework], the stress is far from over. This is in view of...
More Comments are closed

Giving push to second generation reforms

A section of the commentators is always on the prowl looking for the slightest opportunity to lambast Modi – dispensation irrespective of the state of the economy. During the first four years of its first term i.e. 2014-15 to 2017-18 when GDP [gross domestic product] figures were promising, they blamed the government for fabricating data. But, when the numbers were not so promising as during 2018-19 and first half of current year, they target it for allegedly doing great damage to the economy, loss of jobs and income earning opportunities. Unfortunately, in this blame game that gets hyper-publicity in the media, some of the transformative reforms undertaken by this government – reforms that will have lasting effect for generations in...
More Comments are closed

Govt must learn to let PSUs go

Privatisation and controls can’t go hand-in-hand. The Centre’s instinct to retain its hold on PSUs indirectly should give way to wholesome transfer of ownership and authority to private investors In the Budget presented on July 5, Union Finance Minister Nirmala Sitharaman announced disinvestment of the Government’s shareholding in public sector undertakings (PSUs) to a level below 51 per cent on a “case-by-case” basis. The Cabinet Committee on Economic Affairs (CCEA) is expected to approve this policy soon. The 51 per cent threshold is very crucial as shareholding at this level or above enables the Government to have majority ownership and control over the undertaking. If the holding is reduced to below 51 per cent, this will lead to relinquishment of majority ownership...
More Comments are closed

PSUs – privatization and controls can’t go hand-in-hand

In her budget presented on July 5, 2019, the finance minister, Nirmala Sitharaman announced disinvestment of governments’ shareholding in public sector undertakings [PSUs] to a level below 51% on a ‘case-by-case’ basis. The cabinet committee on economic affairs [CCEA] is expected to approve this policy any time soon. The 51% threshold is very crucial as shareholding at this level or above enables the government to have majority ownership and control over the undertaking. If, the holding is reduced to below 51%, this will lead to relinquishment of majority ownership and control, or privatization in plain words. This will be transformative – a bold reform indeed. But, hold your breath, there is a caveat appended to it. In the budget speech, Sitharaman...
More Comments are closed

PSU privatization – will Modi crack the whip?

The ‘strategic disinvestment’ is an acronym used to denote transfer of a sizeable portion of ownership and management control of the state in a public sector undertaking [PSU] to an investor [call him ‘strategic’ investor] by selling commensurate shares. In a transformative sense, the government could reduce its holding to below 51% so as to lead to relinquishment of its majority ownership and control, or privatization in plain words. The governments, the world over, have used this as an instrument to vacate areas of economic activity where they believe the state ought not to be involved in the very first place or after having operated for a certain period, currently feel it is no longer necessary. It is also used...
More No comments