Category: Foreign investment & other inflows

Market-place – who is burning cash?

Amidst continuing uncertainties of the policy environment for foreign direct investment [FDI] in multi-brand retail [MBR], a flurry of concerns have been raised by stakeholders especially with regard to the role of MNCs such as Amazon/Flipkart which have increased their presence in India particularly in the e-commerce space. The retailers associations [those representing the ‘mom-and-pop’ stores] have complained that they are indulging in predatory pricing – a euphemism for selling at rates substantially below cost of production/purchase and distribution –  and funding the resultant loss from the dollars brought in from their global parent. This will not only threaten the survival of the street corner shops but even hit the consumers in the long-run as having captured a major slice of...
More No comments

Amazon, Flipkart flouting FDI norms. Really, ED?!

During hearing on a public interest litigation in Delhi high court on October 31, the Enforcement Directorate (ED) said it is investigating alleged violation of the Foreign Exchange Management Act (FEMA) against Amazon and Flipkart. The charge is that these companies have violated the extant norms for foreign direct investment (FDI) guidelines as contained in Press Note (PN) 3 (2016-17). The PN 3 allows 100% FDI in the ‘marketplace’ model for e-commerce. An entity working on this model offers a platform to sellers and buyers to conduct transactions. It acts as a facilitator by offering them services such as booking orders, raising invoices, arranging deliveries, collecting payments, etc. It can’t own stocks and can’t sell directly to the consumer. The...
More No comments

Amazon/Flipkart flouting FDI norms – really!

During hearing on a public interest litigation [PIL] in Delhi High Court [DHC], on October 31, 2018, the Enforcement Directorate [ED] informed that it is investigating alleged violation of the Foreign Exchange Management Act [FEMA] against foreign majors such as Amazon and Flipkart. The specific charge is that these companies have violated the extant norms for foreign direct investment [FDI] guidelines as contained in Press Note [PN] 3 [2016-17]. The PN 3 allows 100% FDI in the ‘market-place’ model for e-commerce. An entity working on this model offers a platform to sellers and buyers to conduct transactions. It acts as a facilitator by offering them services such as booking order, raising invoice, arranging delivery, collecting payments, handling rejections etc. It...
More No comments

Shutting out NRI/PIO-run funds, a bad idea

Faced with a shortage of capital and a compelling need to boost economic growth, successive governments have taken steps to attract foreign investment. But when the inflow happens to be of Indian money that left our shores in a clandestine manner and is coming back in the garb of foreign capital — ‘rounding tripping’ in common parlance — it raises many eyebrows. Until a few years ago, the extant policy and regulatory environment hugely facilitated ‘rounding tripping’. There was little regulatory oversight on money leaving and there were tax havens ever ready to attract it. The shell companies, set up in those havens by the people to whom the money belonged, would then invest in India, fully leveraging benevolent tax...
More No comments

FDI in retail – policy void and unfounded fear

Recently, a task force [TF] on e-commerce under the then commerce secretary, Rita Teaotia had recommended 49% FDI [foreign direct investment] in Indian retail in online marketplaces that hold inventory and sell directly to consumers [B2C]. However, this is subject to only 100% made-in-India products being sold through such platforms. Further, the platform must be promoted by resident Indian and controlled by Indian management. This had led to consternation among Indian companies in the organized retail such as Reliance Retail Limited [RRL], Futures Group etc who opined that this would violate guidelines as encapsulated in Press Note [PN] 3 [2016-17] which bars foreign investment in B2C. The foreign majors operating in on-line market place viz. Amazon, Flipkart etc also protested...
More No comments

Shutting NRIs/PIOs-run FPIs – a bad idea

Faced with shortage of domestic capital and compelling need to accelerate the rate of economic growth, successive governments have taken steps to attract foreign investment. Strictly speaking, the capital inflows to India should be sourced from income generated from business or otherwise – by persons located in foreign jurisdictions. The persons could be foreigners or non-resident Indians [NRIs] or persons of Indian origin [PIOs] or overseas citizens of India [OCIs]. In case however, the inflow happens to be Indian money which left our shores in a clandestine manner and comes back  in the garb of foreign capital [also known as ‘rounding tripping’ in common parlance] then, it raises many eyebrows. Until a few years ago, the extant policy and regulatory...
More No comments

FDI in retail – return of ‘license raj’

A discussion paper released by the commerce ministry on the draft policy for e-commerce has led to more confusion in regard to the role of foreign direct investment [FDI] in Indian retail. At the outset, let us take a look at a major policy announcement in 2016-17 regarding e-commerce – commonly referred to as Press Note [PN] 3. The guidelines notified vide PN-3, allow 100% FDI in the so called ‘market-place’ model for e-commerce – an IT platform where sellers and buyers conduct transactions. An e-commerce company working on this model merely acts as a facilitator by offering to them services such as booking order, raising invoice, arranging delivery, collecting payment, stocking goods etc. It does not own stocks and...
More No comments

FDI in food retail – Amazon faces policy hurdles

In the budget for 2016-17, the union government had announced 100% foreign direct investment [FDI] in food retail – both offline and online. However, such investment was subject to retailer selling only the food procured from farmers in India and processed locally and undertaking investment in back-end infrastructure. The Indian retail market is worth over US$ 650 billion of which food alone accounts for about 50%. The market is dominated by small grocery [or the so called mom-and-pop] stores. The organized retail constitutes less than 10% despite the private sector [albeit domestic] having made forays into retail for over two decades now. So, the opportunities for FDI in food are unprecedented. In this backdrop, one would have expected a big...
More No comments

Walmart’s backdoor entry into Indian retail

Walmart, the $500 billion retail giant, has acquired 77% stake in Flipkart, a leading Indian brand in e-commerce segment, with an investment of $16 billion. The balance 23% will be with minority investors, including Alphabet (a subsidiary of global internet giant Google) which will invest $1.5 billion. Walmart is not new to the Indian market. It came to India initially in 2007 in the “wholesale cash and carry” business viz sale to wholesalers and other bulk buyers (including institutional agencies) under a joint venture (JV) arrangement with Bharti Retail. This was under the then FDI (foreign direct investment) policy which allowed foreign investor 51% stake in this business. In 2012, the then UPA-II government liberalised the policy to allow 100%...
More No comments

Walmart’s backdoor entry in Indian retail

Walmart – the US$ 500 billion retail giant has acquired 77% stake in Flipkart – the leading Indian brand in e-commerce segment – with an investment of US$ 16 billion. The balance 23% will be with minority investors including Alphabet [a subsidiary of global internet giant Google] which will invest US$ 1.5 billion. Walmart is not new to the Indian market. It came to India initially in 2007 in the ‘wholesale cash and carry’ business viz. sale to wholesalers and other bulk buyers [including institutional agencies] under a joint venture [JV] arrangement with Bharti Retail. This was under the then FDI [foreign direct investment] policy which allowed foreign investor 51% stake in this business. In 2012, the then government under...
More No comments