Category: Regulatory environment

India’s sugar imbroglio

The Government’s irresistible desire to control sugar prices is doing much harm to the industry. Upholding market dynamics should be the way forward In the run-up to the Assembly elections in Uttar Pradesh in 2017, the BJP had promised immediate payment of all sugarcane arrears (money that sugar mills owe to the Government for cane supplies). For future purposes, too, it had assured to release all dues by the 14th day, counting from the day the sugarcane is delivered to the mill. The BJP Government has been in office in Uttar Pradesh for over two years now and has since ensured payments of a whopping Rs 50,000 crore, which includes Rs 10,500 crore for the marketing year October 1, 2016-September 30, 2017;...
More No comments

Sugar imbroglio – robbing Peter to pay Paul

In the run up to assembly elections in Uttar Pradesh [UP] in early 2017, BJP had promised immediate payment of all sugarcane arrears [money that sugar mills owe to them for their cane supplies]. For the future also, it had promised to release of all dues by the 14th day counting from the day the sugarcane is delivered to the sugar mill. The UP government has been in office for over two years now and has since ensured payments of a whopping Rs 50,000 crore which includes Rs 10,500 crore for the sugarcane marketing year October 1, 2016 – September 30, 2017 and Rs 34,000 crore for the year October 1, 2017 – September 30, 2018 and Rs 5500 crore...
More No comments

Doubling farmers’ income – FPOs could be game changer

During the last five years, Modi – government has implemented measures such as increase in irrigation, issue of soil health cards [SHCs], neem coating of urea, crop insurance [at minimal premium], building rural roads, e-NAM [electronic national agriculture market], increase in credit availability and implementation of Dr Swaminathan committee recommendation to give minimum support price [MSP] equal to 150% of the production cost. These measures aim at increasing crop output, enhance efficiency of input use, fetch higher price from sale of agricultural produce and do on-farm value addition with the overarching objective of doubling farmers’ income by 2022. Further, to augment the income of small and marginal farmers [land holding < 2 hectare]. in the interim budget for 2019-20, it...
More No comments

Farmers’ distress, rising sops, depleting treasury

After its defeat in three Hindi heartland states Madhya Pradesh [MP], Rajasthan and Chattisgarh, Modi – dispensation has gone into introspection mode. The top brass has recognized that a major factor behind the set-back was growing resentment among the farmers over its policies and schemes which they felt are responsible for their stagnating/declining income. Sensing that this could seriously affect party’s fortunes in upcoming general elections, it is brainstorming over alternate policies which could address their concerns. Taking cue from Telengana’s Rythu Bandhu under which the state gives Rs 4000 per acre to each farmer – as crop neutral investment support – before the start of the season Kharif [April-September] and Rabi [October-March], an idea is to give farmers assured...
More No comments

A policy on MSP will be fiscally suicidal

In all probability, the Government must not tread the path of giving legal backing to MSP. Already, it is struggling to find resources for food subsidy under NFSA. An alternative path is to find platforms where farmers can sell their produce On November 30, 2018, tens of thousands of farmers congregated in the national capital to protest against their financial distress arising out of non-remunerative price for their agricultural output and ever-increasing farm debt burden. They wanted a special session of Parliament to discuss their problems and demanded the passage of two laws (i) to guarantee Minimum Support Price (MSP) for all crops based on the recommendations of the National Commission on Agriculture under MS Swaminathan (2006) and (ii) ‘one-time’...
More No comments

Cure worse than the disease

The Maharashtra Government’s bid to ensure good crop price for farmers is laudable but this must not be done by excessively penalising errant traders. Other options must be explored In August, the Devendra Fadnavis Government approved several amendments to the Maharashtra Agricultural Produce Marketing (Development & Regulation) Act, 1963, to bring it in line with the Centre’s model of Agricultural Produce and Livestock Marketing (Promotion & Facilitation) Act, 2017. As a result, the entire State was declared as a single market. Now, instead of the earlier rule, where traders would require separate licences for operating in each ‘notified’ APMC market, they will now need a single license that will enable them purchase agricultural produce from any mandi within the State. This is a good...
More No comments

Unable to pay MSP, face one-year jail term

Last month, the Devendra Fadnavis government approved amendments to the Maharashtra Agricultural Produce Marketing [Development & Regulation] Act, 1963 to bring it in line with the Centre’s Model Agricultural Produce and Livestock Marketing –[Promotion & Facilitation] Act, 2017. As per the amendment, the entire state is declared as a single market instead of the earlier rule of notifying “market areas” where sale/purchase of farm commodities could take place. Henceforth, a trader will need a single license enabling him to purchase agricultural produce from any mandi within Maharashtra. This is a good decision that can help farmers realize a better price. In yet another decision, the Maharashtra government has made purchase of a farm commodity below the official minimum support price [MSP] a...
More No comments

Sugar-cane mess – let market forces deal with it

The arrears of sugarcane farmers [money that sugar mills owe to them for their cane supplies] running into thousands of crore has been a perpetual headache for the ruling establishment both at the centre and states. Last year, in the run up to assembly elections in Uttar Pradesh [mills owe the maximum amount to farmers in this state], Modi had promised immediate payment of all arrears and for the future, ensure release of payment by 14th day counting from the day the cane is delivered to the factory. On assumption of office, the BJP government led by Yogi redeemed the commitment by clearing all arrears. Yet, last month, BJP lost the Kairana by-election to Lok Sabha. A major reason for...
More No comments

Farmers on agitation, despite Modi’s all out help

A ten day nation-wide protest [beginning June 1] by farmers that involves refusal to sell their crop to consumers and block movement to cities would suggest that they are in deep distress. This is completely out of sync with what Modi – government as also the states ruled by BJP are doing to increase farmers’ income and provide them security. In this regard, major steps implemented by it during the last 4 years, may be put under three broad categories viz. (i) enhancing crop output; (ii) ensuring a good/remunerative price; (iii) providing insurance against natural calamities. As regards (i), Modi – government has taken up on a war scale implementation of 99 irrigation projects aimed at reaching water to farmers’...
More No comments

Assuring MSP – MAS hugely negative for centre and state budgets

Stung by depressed price realization by farmers much below the minimum support price [MSP] and impending general elections next year, Modi – government announced in the Union Budget for 2018-19 that henceforth, they will be assured MSP which is at least 1.5 times the cost of production. Mere assurance of a remunerative price is of no use unless the farmer is able to sell his entire produce at this price. Keen to ensure that this happens, the government asked NITI Aayog to come up with suggestions. The latter prescribed three alternatives viz. market assurance scheme [MAS]; deficiency payments and incentives to private sector to buy farmers produce at MSP. Under MAS, agencies of the state buy the produce directly from...
More No comments