The inclusion of ineligible persons on the beneficiaries list of PM-KISAN raises concerns and undoes the very purpose the scheme was launched for A significant decline in the number of farmers receiving income transfers under the Pradhan Mantri Kisan Samman Nidhi (PM-KISAN) Scheme from 104 million during 2021-22 to 80 million during 2022-23 and a corresponding reduction in payment from Rs 67,032 crore in 2021-22 to Rs 57,646 crore in 2022-23 has caused much consternation. Launched by Prime Minister Narendra Modi on February 24, 2019, and made effective from December 1, 2018, PM-KISAN is a Central Sector Direct Benefit Transfer (DBT) Scheme under which the Union Government. It provides an income support of Rs 6,000 a year to farmers with...
More Comments are closed
Articles
Fiscal target gliding away from its path
To reset the targets at a significantly relaxed level and then claim that fiscal numbers are well on track looks amusing In the Union Budget for 2022–23, Finance Minister Nirmala Sitharaman kept the Budget Estimate (BE) for the fiscal deficit (FD) at 6.4% of GDP. She described this as ‘advancing on the road to fiscal consolidation,’ citing the target of 4.5 % to be achieved by 2025–26 (this was announced in her budget speech for 2021-22). As per the revised estimate (RE) given while presenting the budget for 2023–24, she has precisely achieved this number. For 2023–24, she has kept the target at 5.9%, and for 2025–26, one would get the sense that the Union government is proceeding at the...
More Comments are closed
Administrative measures can’t curb misuse of fertiliser subsidies
Routing the subsidy through manufacturers and keeping the selling price of fertilisers artificially low, makes diversion of subsidised fertilisers profitable for dubious players The availability of fertilisers at an ‘artificially’ low price is very tempting to all stakeholders in the supply chain. (File image) About 41 percent of fertiliser subsidy is diverted to non-agricultural uses including smuggling to neighbouring countries, 24 percent is consumed by larger farmers and another 24 percent is spent on inefficient producers, the Economic Survey 2015-16 noted. That essentially means that just about 11 percent of the subsidy goes to small and medium farmers. The Union government subsidises fertiliser sales to keep input costs low for farmers. Diversion to purposes other than farming is a misuse...
More Comments are closed
Bring petroleum products under GST
The Finance Minister should proactively engage with states to speed up the process of taxing petroleum goods under the GST Finance Minister Nirmala Sitharaman has exhorted the states to give their concurrence for fixing the tax rate for five petroleum goods—crude oil, natural gas (NG), petrol, diesel, and aviation turbine fuel (ATF)—under the Goods and Services Tax (GST) to enable the GST Council to give its stamp of approval to this pending proposal. GST is a single nationwide tax with a provision for set-off tax paid on inputs. It subsumes within it more than a dozen taxes from the pre-GST era, namely central excise duty (CED), service tax, and sales tax/value added tax (VAT). Besides, a host of local taxes...
More Comments are closed
Fertiliser Subsidy: Scrap pricing scheme and decontrol urea
Bureaucrats are micro-managing the operations of urea plants through the New Pricing Scheme. This is the surest way to scuttle any initiative to cut costs and improve efficiency The genesis of NPS lies in the Union government asking manufacturers to sell urea to farmers at a low ‘uniform’ price. (Representative Image) In the context of the debate over increasing fertiliser subsidy, a major issue that often escapes public attention is the New Pricing Scheme (NPS) for urea. The genesis of NPS lies in the Union government asking manufacturers to sell urea to farmers at a low ‘uniform’ price unrelated to the cost of production and distribution, which is higher, and its promise to reimburse them the differential amount as a subsidy....
More Comments are closed
Let FDI in retail come from the front door
Allowing FDI in retail would be in the best interest of consumers as this will enable all retailers to compete with one another on equal terms Following complaints from consumers and traders against “widespread cheating and unfair trade practices” by e-commerce marketplaces such as Amazon and Flipkart, the Union government intends to amend consumer protection rules to bar these firms from (i) selling their private labels on their platforms; (ii) make them liable for frauds committed by a seller; (iii) prohibit them from having their logistics chain for supply-chain management. The marketplace is a platform where vendors sell their products to consumers even as its owner merely acts as a facilitator by providing services such as booking orders, raising invoices,...
More Comments are closed
Resurrecting three farm laws
Farmers will continue to be in distress as long as they are shackled by the state APMC laws Reports of a farmer from Maharashtra’s Solapur getting a measly Rs 2.49 from the sale of 512 kg onions to a trader (for Rs 1 per kg on sale executed at the Solapur market yard, total sale value comes to Rs 512; after deducting labour, weighing, transportation and other charges adding to Rs 509.5, the net realization is Rs 2.49) in the district has led to all-round consternation. Rs 2.49 is the net revenue from the sale of the crop; it isn’t a profit. To arrive at it, we need to deduct from this the cost of producing 512 kg onions which...
More Comments are closed
Banish those thoughts of LPG subsidy ending in the near term
LPG subsidy is here to stay notwithstanding proclamations by successive governments to end it. This is because actions on the ground are driven by populism, not economics Subsidy on LPG is the excess of its cost of supply over the price paid by the beneficiary. (Representative image) In the Union Budget for 2023-24, finance minister Nirmala Sitharaman has kept the budget estimate (BE) for petroleum subsidy – primarily subsidy on liquefied petroleum gas (LPG) for household consumption – for 2023-24 at a mere Rs 2,257 crore. The subsidy on the purchase of a product is a financial assistance given by the state to persons who cannot afford to pay the market-based or cost-plus price. Subsidy on LPG is the excess...
More Comments are closed
Exit from LPG subsidy, completely
In June 2020, the Government stopped giving LPG subsidies. It is time to do away with the hidden subsidy on the cylinder for better fiscal management In the Union Budget for 2023-24, finance minister Nirmala Sitharaman has shown an expenditure of Rs 9,170 crore on petroleum subsidy (this is primarily a subsidy on LPG for household consumption) during 2022-23 as per the revised estimates (RE). She has kept the budget estimate (BE) for 2023-24 at Rs 2,257.09 crore. By definition, a subsidy on the purchase of any given product is financial assistance given by the state to a certain class of persons who cannot afford to pay the market-based or cost-plus price from their limited income. Subsidy on LPG is...
More Comments are closed
Levy 5% GST on natural gas to reduce fertiliser subsidy
Bringing natural gas under GST can end the extant differential taxation regime/varying urea cost and subsidy payments across states. It will eliminate the cascading effect of tax on tax Fertilisers attract GST at the rate of 5 percent. This together with low MRP results in a scenario where output tax liability is insufficient to offset taxes paid on inputs such as natural gas. Finance minister Nirmala Sitharaman has said that the tax rate for five petroleum goods – crude oil, natural gas, petrol, diesel and aviation turbine fuel (ATF) – can be fixed under the Goods and Services Tax (GST) as soon as the states give their consent at a GST Council meeting. GST is a ‘single tax’ applied all...
More Comments are closed